Image may be NSFW.
Clik here to view.
Well he didn't mention me explicitly, but he does reference a race realist blogger by the name of "Paul Kersey" who runs the blog "Stuff Black People Don't LIke" or SBPDL:
http://stuffblackpeopledontlik...
Sowell in his latest column mentions the book "White Girls Bleed Alot" which highlights the multi-city wave of attacks against whites by blacks. Here is Sowell's article:
http://www.wnd.com/2013/10/bla...
I'm guessing that Sowell is now officially a racist for acknowledging the black crime rate and the Leftist race war against whites. Or is that title just reserved for me?
More dangerous than these highly publicized episodes over the years are innumerable organized and unprovoked physical attacks on whites by young black gangs in shopping malls, on beaches and in other public places all across the country today.
While some of these attacks make it into the media as isolated incidents, the nationwide pattern of organized black on white attacks by thugs remains invisible in the mainstream media, with the notable exception of Bill O’Reilly on the Fox News Channel.
And Sowell even gets this:
Even when these attacks are accompanied by shouts of anti-white rhetoric and exultant laughter at the carnage, the racial makeup of the attackers and their victims is usually ignored by the media, and public officials often deny that race has anything to do with what happened.
That's right the media doesn't even want to mention the race of this never ending stream of black criminals. I would bet dollars to donuts that 99% of Objectivists would agree with the Leftist media policy (I'm sure as shit that Diana Hsieh would). After all what relevance is race? That's barnyard racism just like Rand said and Michael Moeller reminded us all.
The reality of savage black violence and of the reality of race and heredity can not be suppressed forever. Even Sowell and O'Reily are starting to see the picture. Will Objectivists? I won't hold my breath.
Sowell ends with this paragraph:
It would be easy to simply dismiss Kersey as a racist. But denouncing him or ignoring him is not refuting him. Refuting requires thought, which has largely been replaced by fashionable buzz words and catch phrases, when it comes to discussions of race.
Thought is long overdue. So is honesty.
Remarkable, a black Conservative is infinitely more honest about race realism than white Objectivists. "Refuting requires thought". Oh I thought it required knee-jerk accusations of racism. Silly me. And silly Sowell.
